A Technology That Would Change The World (If It Exists) | Answers With Joe a technology that would change the world

by SOUthkoreaquIZ



Brilliant 프리미엄 구독 20% 할인 – 평생! 연구원 Fleischmann과 Pons가 실온에서 핵융합을 유도하는 화학 공정을 통해 에너지를 생성했다는 발표와 함께 1989년 현장에서 발생한 Cold Fusion 버스트에 등록하십시오. 아무도 그들의 발견을 복제할 수 없었을 때, 상온 핵융합은 수십 년 동안 가장 큰 과학 실패 중 하나로 무너졌습니다. 그러나 어떤 사람들은 그들이 올바른 길을 가고 있으며 그들의 방법이 세상을 바꾸는 열쇠가 될 수 있다고 믿습니다. 아래 기사 및 비디오 링크. Patreon에서 저를 지원하십시오! Tesla 구매에 관심이 있으십니까? 내 추천 링크를 사용하고 할인 및 특전 받기: 채널 회원이 되어 독점 라이브스트림 및 콘텐츠에 액세스할 수 있습니다. 여기에서: 내 모든 곳에서 나를 팔로우하세요! Instagram: Snapchat: Facebook: Twitter: LINKS LINKS LINKS: MinutePhysics – 격자 지원 저온 핵융합 방법을 보여주는 Muon-Catalyzed Fusion Animation의 탁월한 분석: Pro-LENR 비디오: LENR 연구 연구 아카이브: .

Images related to the topic a technology that would change the world

A Technology That Would Change The World (If It Exists) | Answers With Joe

A Technology That Would Change The World (If It Exists) | Answers With Joe

Search related to the topic A Technology That Would Change The World (If It Exists) | Answers With Joe

#Technology #Change #World #Exists #Answers #Joe
A Technology That Would Change The World (If It Exists) | Answers With Joe
a technology that would change the world
여기에서 많은 유용한 정보를 볼 수 있습니다: 여기에서 더 보기
여기에서 많은 유용한 정보를 볼 수 있습니다: 여기에서 더 보기

You may also like

24 comments

Michael Combrink 13/12/2021 - 6:04 Chiều

Are muons naturally produced anywhere, from the sun, radioactive material, black holes,

Anti matter is expensive to make but radioactive material naturally shoots off a bit all the time, there's a company collecting anti matter for space travel

Reply
Michael Combrink 13/12/2021 - 6:04 Chiều

Ok my question, if this did work, would the palladium get ripped apart with every reaction
And what if a ton of nucleation sites got primed at the same time,
💥 BOOM 💥

Reply
Robyn Smith 13/12/2021 - 6:04 Chiều

I think that continuing research on things that can literally change the way that we (as a species) can travel through space is ABSOLUTELY WORTH IT! I also think that scientists by the masses should be collectively working on figuring out exactly how gravity works. That is another thing that would CHANGE EVERYTHING!

Reply
Ryan Katic 13/12/2021 - 6:04 Chiều

Everything worth exploring. so long as you accept that failure is totally an option

Reply
Duchess 13/12/2021 - 6:04 Chiều

Science is the modern worlds religion. and its priests are just as closed minded and arrogant.

Reply
SolarWinds AuroraBorealis 13/12/2021 - 6:04 Chiều

Hey Joe, thanks for all the eye opening vids. Question, do you make your living on YouTube or do you have a profession other than Answers with Joe? We'd be curious to know. Thanks!

Reply
Jason J 13/12/2021 - 6:04 Chiều

its sad that the scientific community would just give up on it bc 2 ppl are assholes. bummer. you never know.

Reply
King Nekogon 13/12/2021 - 6:04 Chiều

"Junk science or worth exploring?"
Focus on making Muons easier (cheaper) to make, or prevent them from sticking. Yeet the lattice bs out the window.

Reply
Christopher Caldwell 13/12/2021 - 6:04 Chiều

Imagine trying to explain something like GPS (which depends on the speed of light) to someone who thought Newton's Laws were "the final answer".

What it comes down to is "have you done the work?" If somebody comes to you with this really cool theory/idea AND can show you how they got there, all power to them.

It's really hard for me to declare that cold fusion is impossible with particles apparently going back and forth in time… but I'd want to see the chain of events leading up such an extraordinary claim.

Reply
Robert Deskins 13/12/2021 - 6:04 Chiều

Just remember archeology is NOT science the same way chemistry & physics is

Reply
LordPadriac 13/12/2021 - 6:04 Chiều

NASA won't touch emdrive no matter how promising it could be they're too regimented to take actual scientific risks anymore. Maybe it's a pipe dream but it's something that can only be tested in space. I think if someone with their very own private space fleet were to launch a study into and it played out…forget about going to see little green men or settling colonies – there's still too much other work that needs to be done like some way to mimic gravity. If the emdrive was tested and it worked and was perfected; whatever company did that would own energy and be the ONLY name in clean energy from that point on. If you have an engine that takes no power but generates movement then you have a way to spin a dynamo and beam that energy via laser or microwave back to Earth for use.

Reply
0x777 13/12/2021 - 6:04 Chiều

Cold fusion is about 20 years out.

Granted, it has been 20 years out for about half a century…

Reply
John Guerra 13/12/2021 - 6:04 Chiều

“The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing.”
― Socrates

Reply
Arash Arfaee 13/12/2021 - 6:04 Chiều

I can see one exception to your thinking ways. There are people that although they might not realize it, it is their jobs to force themselves to think differently. Scientists themselves or at leat those who do something big, usually start from not accepting things as is.
But in general, I agree with you. I can have the luxury of doubting everything around my own speciality, but I trust the rest to what majority of scientists can agree on them. Which Btw, at best 30% somewhat accurate and in time most of them will be discredited or replaced with a new version that many time is an improved version of the old views. I don't see a way to do better than this while one keeps studying and thinking and growing that might lead to some wisdom seeing things a bit better starting seeing things. And get back to the right side of the DK graph in a different level! 🤔

Reply
Whine 13/12/2021 - 6:04 Chiều

What most people don't know is that a Cold Fusion machine was invented, but it was stolen by the infamous PAYDAY gang for a certain right-leaning senator backed by a large oil conglomerate.

Reply
Vinny Lamoureux 13/12/2021 - 6:04 Chiều

It's worth the risk cuz the people who do it are so wedded to whatever it is that they might go ok nuts otherwise.

Reply
Stoney's Dead 13/12/2021 - 6:04 Chiều

I think skepticism can lead to cynicism and that's what we need to avoid. But as long as your skepticism is applied appropriately so that it doesn't squash creativity and thinking out of the box- it's a good thing I think. The w ay I look at it there's no way you can study it all- at some point if you're going to be educated and informed you have to take someone's word for it. At least when it comes to science I know and understand the means by which they arrived at their opinions- the scientific method. In reality I'm trusting that method- not them or their authority. This is why I feel it's super important that we hold these ppl accountable to following that method always- never deviating or letting bias skew the outcome any more than what's absolutely unavoidable. This means policing the way papers are published, the way labs operate, how experiments are carried out, etc. Because like any other institution science is not immune to the almighty influence of the dollar.

Reply
Ed Reusser 13/12/2021 - 6:04 Chiều

I wish you would have talked more about the lack of neutrons and the lack of other evidence that fusion took place. And yes I believe that this should be pursued. The fact that it works so well with muons means that the amount of energy required is in the same magnitude as that required. It may be possible to modify the substrate to get better results.

Reply
pedro pedrohan 13/12/2021 - 6:04 Chiều

8:22 i thought it was the other 1989

Reply
MoneyMakerUDV 13/12/2021 - 6:04 Chiều

And now, 2 years later, we are pretty close to implement this, at least progress is huge

Reply
Masternuckable 13/12/2021 - 6:04 Chiều

Fusion is at 97-98% efficiency at this point. Uber exciting!

Reply
Martin Samuelian 13/12/2021 - 6:04 Chiều

Joe, what about Max Planck's believes on consciousness? ps: you are very good at what you do. Well done

Reply
Joseph Stokes 13/12/2021 - 6:04 Chiều

GRAMMAR! _ Joe, I'm back! One cannot have something "between" three people! It is "among" when there are more than two!! Come on, this is sixth grade grammar!!

Reply
Christopher Zenga 13/12/2021 - 6:04 Chiều

Can you cut the opening to this and reupload for today’s world?

Reply

Leave a Comment